Yharvest is continuous field data infrastructure for fertilizer efficiency and in-season agronomic analytics. Not sensors — a structured, season-long view of how your soil and microclimate actually behave between the decisions that matter.
Episodic lab tests tell you what the soil looked like on a specific day. They don't tell you how it responded to irrigation, fertilization, rainfall, or heat stress — the information you actually need to make the next decision.
Within one season, your team receives a structured, usable view of soil and microclimate dynamics that cannot be obtained from episodic lab sampling alone — a season-long dataset and analytics package showing how the field behaves between agronomic actions.
Yharvest isn't a mass-market product. It's built for operations where the difference between zones, between weeks, and between treatment regimes materially affects outcomes.
Agronomy teams running trials across many fields who need standardized, comparable data at scale — and the analytics layer to make it operational.
Farms testing new fertilizer regimes, nutrition schemes, hybrids, or agronomic technologies — where objective in-season evidence is the point of the exercise.
Viticulture, berries, vegetables, specialty crops — operations where each zone's behavior compounds into meaningful yield and quality variance.
Fields with heterogeneous soils or irrigation lines where whole-field averages hide the real agronomic picture — and where zone-level decisions pay for themselves quickly.
A sensor deployment that ends with a stack of CSVs isn't a pilot — it's abandoned equipment. Every Yharvest pilot includes the setup, interpretation, and closing steps that make the data actionable.
We co-design the pilot with your agronomy team: device placement logic, comparison structure, sampling protocol, and success criteria. Nothing is installed until the experimental design holds up to scrutiny.
Raw sensor streams don't help decision-makers. You receive an interpreted layer: EC dynamics by zone, moisture-response patterns, microclimate events, and structured findings — not raw data dumps.
A structured post-season report: what the field did, what the data showed, how it compared to your prior assumptions, and what to test next season. Usable directly in R&D documentation or stakeholder reporting.
Anyone promising guaranteed yield or a fixed ROI without a controlled experimental design is selling a story. We sell the instrument and the analytics — the agronomic decisions stay where they belong: with your team.
Yharvest commits to the full scope of deployment, continuous data collection, and structured reporting. If we fall short of agreed scope, we continue working at our cost until it is complete.
"If Yharvest does not complete the agreed deployment, data collection, and reporting scope, the service continues at Yharvest's cost until the agreed dataset and analytics package are delivered."
Promises in this category require controlled experiments and evidence we don't yet have. When we get them, we'll say so — not before.
Every Yharvest deployment requires manual setup, field-specific comparison logic, and analytics tailored to the crop and operation. The number of partners we take on is bounded by what our agronomy and engineering team can genuinely support — not by marketing.
If your team runs fertilizer trials, manages high-margin zones, or needs defensible in-season data for decisions — get in touch to scope a 2026 pilot. A 30-minute call, no deck.